What. The. Fuck.

I don’t think many people would be surprised to read a news article dealing with sexual abuse in South Africa. Or AIDS. Etc, etc, etc. For better or worse, it’s kind of the usual reference for “horrible situation dealing with sex.” But a survey finding one in four South African men have raped someone?

I have no words.

Now, keep in mind life expectancy is pretty low, so I’m disinclined from the get-go to chalk it off as an “old pracitce on its way out.”

One in 20 men surveyed said they had raped a woman or girl in the last year.

Professor Rachel Jewkes of the MRC, who carried out the research, told the BBC’s World Today programme: “The absolute imperative is we have to change the underlying social attitudes that in a way have created a norm that coercing women into sex is on some level acceptable.

Oh man, I can’t wait for somebody to start cracking totally hilarious jokes about this horrible situation. I bet they will be awesome. Can’t wait for it to become obvious what rape really is, and stop the sadly still-widespread practice of acting like it really isn’t that big of a deal, come on. Way to ruin everything, liberal PC-Police! We also make fun of dudes getting raped, so it’s all fair!

Hopefully that 25% male population happens to be observant catholic. That way they’ll be fighting the real problem about AIDS by praying while raping without a condom, so they are safe from catching anything (because you know, the victims don’t count as people, so no need to worry about their emotional and physical damage).

I’m not sure I want to see a complementary survey on how many South African women have been raped.

Hot damn.

This is what happens when Jack Bauer is too busy

The Terrorists win.

Luckily once we start some enhanced interrogatin’ medieval shit on the terrorist and other likely suspects that terrify us all will be well and we’ll be able to stop any and all further terrorist attacks, right?





P.S. When do we start cataloging all those religious Madrasas that indoctrinate and support all the groups that plot to destroy our freedoms on a daily basis? When do we get to call them terrorist enablers, and by extension, just as bad? Man, it feels great to not have to think about stuff and just go apeshit acting on your fears and resentments and start calling people names and being an overall extremist who denounces evil shit all the time. Shades of gray are for those who want the evildoers to win. DO YOU!?

John Cole is a happy man

Finally somebody came through with the J-Lo-Sotomayor comparison, and it is truly hilarious in the lunatic flavor that it was inevitable to come in.

More on Christianist terrorism

The Rude Pundit thinks of a ticking bomb scenario, and what our recent course of action towards terrorists dictates is the natural reaction.

I bet all those bloodthirsty warmongering neanderthals will be drooling in excitement with the prospects of another electroshocked nutsack. They’ve been kinda sad with all the witholding of prisoner abuse picture porn by the Obama administration (Wheeeeeeeeee Change!)

I mean, if we do all that shit to people we’re fighting there (like taxi cab drivers who gave a nasty look to some afghan tribal leader) so we don’t have to fight them here, what shall we do with the crazy assholes killing christians in their own houses of worship in the motherfuckin heartland of the U.S. of A? These people complitely lose their minds over the hypothetical murdering of americans. How over the top will their reaction be to actual cold-blooded assassination? I mean, good-hearted american women just lost 1/3 of their freedoms, for which we are supposed to be loathed?


Terrorists are always brown or black or yellow or whatever

But never white christian conservatives.

Hopefully that bitch won’t commit suicide like the fucking pussy he is and will go on trial and get a just sentence for the brutal crime he committed.

And don’t let them say this is not terrorism. It is an action with absolutely zero intentions of dialogue in mind. They are performed by a person who feels unrepresented, abused and with no other recourse to make things right, or to get some vengeance on people he deems have been doing him wrong. You might sympathize with his position or beliefes or not, but this is as much terrorism as is an ETA political assasination. Its goal is to make other people afraid and to make them suffer once you see no other way to “win” than through brutality.

Fucking savages.

I’m waiting for the RedState post on why Jesus would be OK with shooting doctors who perform abortions. Nothing is more pro-life than killing, after all.

I wonder if O’Reilly woke up with a boner. Loofas everywhere tremble in terror.

Oh gods

Somethings that have been read cannot be unread. Like this one here. Please somebody tell me it’s a parody site, like Stuff White People Like or whatever. Otherwise I’m going to need to bleach my brain. This is too much.

God, I hate fuckin’ airhead nutjob yuppie scum culture.


Liberal Media!

Sweet FSM, this is beyond retardiculous (retardedly ridiculous -and- ridiculously retarded. I got the trademark on the word, don’t try nothin’ funny). There is a news article on CNN dated Two-Thousand fuckin’ Nine, Anno Domini, whose title is, and I promise you I’m not making this shit up, Should your wife have guy-friends?*.

At first glance, it’s raising the horribly (and neanderthalic) unnecessary “issue” of married people starting or continuing friendships with people belonging to the gender that they are generally attracted to (Those poor bisexuals! They can have no friends!), which is plenty stupid on its own merits. Clearly people are still so close to our primate Darwinian forefathers (we were chimpanzees three thousand years ago, it’s a fact now that Obama is High Mullah. Suck it!) that we can’t form serious relationships that don’t involve romance and/or lust. You say there are no doubt people so insecure and/or stuck on the good ole days of the Spanish Inquisition (which is expected by nobody, remember)? Well, that’s only showing that there’s idiots amongst our Homo Sapiens ranks (shocking!), not that it’s a universal property.

Not content to leave it at that, they choose to turn it into a problem for the married women in the title, which to be fair, is not the way the full article goes. The article does talk about both married men and women who are best friends with people of the opposite gender (I don’t recall any non-straight examples), but the title oddly frames it as something only men should worry their spouses are doing. For clearly, men, being the head of the household has earned the divine right to do as he pleases. Behave, woman!

Also, the article goes on to say that it’s cool, totally not marriage-ruining, and in lots of cases an incredibly positive relationship in general to be buddies with someone you could procreate with, biologically speaking (See how I just pretended them gays don’t exist? Subtlety, bitches! Watch and learn). Which is certainly a good thing to say. But why on earth were they giving the notion that it is not cool serious consideration? Do we also need an article titled Should you not beat the crap out of your children if they don’t bring your beers cold enough? How about So you’ve been thinking about setting a burning cross on your dark-skinned neighbor’s lawn? Our Panel of experts addresses the issue. Why give stupid, pointless, clearly wrong ideas an air of validity?

Goddamn Liberal Media.

*Via Shakesville.